I came across some old article that confirmed a lingering suspicion I’ve always had about Feminist, Cultural Marxism and Communism.
I’ve often said that Feminism and Communism were just two heads on the same monster since they both aggressively pushed “forced equality”.
But paradoxically I could never figure out how Russian Women with their backgrounds so deeply rooted in the Soviet tradition and history still managed to keep their feminine identities and traditional nature so completely intact.
Well it turns out that the USSR had their own disastrous experiment with Feminism early on in Soviet History and they knew better.
Check out this piece by Dominic Lawson from the UK Independent.
In the early years of the Soviet Union, there was a genuine attempt, best described in Ferdinand Mount’s The Subversive Family, to apply Marxist thinking on the family. Lunacharski, the Commissar of Education, declared that “Our problem now is to do away with the household and to free women from the care of children … the terms ‘my parents’, ‘our children’ will gradually fall out of usage, being replaced by such conceptions as ‘old people’, ‘children’ and ‘infants.’
This, claimed Lunacharski, would enable the transition to “that broad public society which will replace the domestic hearth, yes, that stagnant family unit which separates itself off from society. A genuine Communist would avoid such a permanent pairing marriage and would seek to satisfy his needs by a freedom of mutual relations … so that you can’t tell who is related to whom and how closely. That is social construction.”
The consequences of this policy were exactly as they have been in the “social construction” we now see in parts of our own inner cities: social chaos, abandoned children and a rapid rise in venereal diseases.
The Communist Party of the Soviet Union soon began to abandon the Marxist approach to family life. New laws were introduced to compel divorced parents, not the state, to contribute towards the maintenance of their children. Divorce itself was made more difficult and expensive.
Trotsky, who had been in the forefront of the anti-family experiment, became a scapegoat in this as in other matters. Now he was denounced as “an enemy of the people, who with his followers covered the family in the USSR with filth, spreading the counter-revolutionary ‘theory’ of the dying out of the family, or disorderly sexual cohabitation, in order to discredit the Soviet land.”
Starting to make the connection here?
The USSR basically realized that Feminism could be used as an excellent weapon to destabilize their enemies in the West and especially with the United States.
Communism always defined itself as a global revolution which had the long term goal of spreading tyranny into the US and the rest of the world.
It first tried to do this by pitching “Class Struggle” but when this approach failed to make any serious inroads they took a different tact instead.
They simply morphed “Class Struggle” into “Gender Struggle” and promoted it as “Women’s Rights” and Feminism.
The Communist were certainly no dummies when it came to handling Feminism with kid gloves that were hazmat compliant.
Feminism was truly toxic and dangerous stuff to their own society.
So during the Cold War the Evil Empire repackaged Feminism like raspberry ice cream made with Chinese milk and serotonin inhibitors and then exported it to the West.
The rest shall we say is history as Oprah, Rossie O’Donnell and Jenny Craig became the new torch bearers of American womanhood.
Check out this valuable article from Henry Makow
“Rape is an expression of … male supremacy … the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men.”
Does this sound like a modern radical feminist?
Guess again. It is from a 1948 American Communist Party pamphlet entitled “Woman Against Myth”by Mary Inman.
In a recent book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation, (2002) feminist historian Kate Weigand states: “ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women’s movement of the 1960s and later.”
In fact, Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism.
There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960’s-1980’s that wasn’t prefigured in the CPUSA of the 1940’s and 1950’s. Many second-wave feminist leaders were “red diaper babies,” the children of Communists.
Communists pioneered the political and cultural analysis of woman’s oppression. They originated women’s studies, and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children’s rights.
They forged key feminist concepts such as “the personal is the political” and techniques such as “consciousness raising.” In the late 1940’s, CPUSA leaders realized that the labor movement was becoming increasingly hostile to Communism.
They began to focus on women and African Americans. They hoped “male supremacy” would “bring more women into the organization and into the fight against the domestic policies of the Cold War.” (80) Communist women who made up 40% of the party wanted more freedom to attend party meetings.
After the publication of “Women Against Myth” in 1948, the CPUSA initiated a process of “re-educating” men that we recognize only too well today. For example, in the party newspaper “The Daily Worker” a photo caption of a man with a young child read, “Families are stronger and happier if the father knows how to fix the cereal, tie the bibs and take care of the youngsters.” (127)
The Party ordered men who didn’t take the woman question seriously to complete “control tasks involving study on the woman question.” In 1954 the Los Angeles branch disciplined men for “hogging discussion at club meetings, bypassing women comrades in leadership and making sex jokes degrading to women.” (94)
A film Salt of the Earth, which critic Pauline Kael called “Communist propaganda”, portrayed women taking a decisive role in their husbands’ labor strike. “Against her husband’s wishes, Esperanza became a leader in the strike and for the first time forged a role for herself outside of her household… [her] political successes persuaded Ramon to accept a new model of family life.” (132) Portrayals of strong assertive successful women became as common in the Communist press and schools, as they are in the mass media today.
Communist women formalized a sophisticated Marxist analysis of the “woman question.” The books In Women’s Defense (1940) by Mary Inman, Century of Struggle (1954) by Eleanor Flexner and The Unfinished Revolution (1962) by Eve Merriam recorded women’s oppression and decried sexism in mass culture and language.
For example, Mary Inman argued that “manufactured femininity” and “overemphasis on beauty” keeps women in subjection (33). The founder of modern feminism, Betty Frieden relied on these texts when she wrote The Feminine Mystique (1963).
These women all hid the fact that they were long-time Communist activists. In the 1960, their daughters had everything they needed, including the example of subterfuge, to start the Women’s Liberation Movement. Feminism’s roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:
- Why the ” woman’s movement” hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like “equality” on a personal, biological and mystical relationship.
- Why the “women’s movement” also embraces equality of race and class.
- Why they want revolution (“transformation”) and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia.
- Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion.
- Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism.
- Why truth for them is a “social construct” defined by whomever has power, and appearances are more important than reality.
- Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favour of their political agenda.
- Why they refuse to debate, don’t believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views.
- Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard.
It is hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Having failed to peddle class war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. The “diversity” and “multicultural” movements represent feminism’s attempt to forge “allegiances” by empowering gays and “people of color.”
Thus, the original CPUSA trio of “race, gender and class” is very much intact but class conflict was never a big seller. The term “politically correct” originated in the Russian Communist Party in the 1920’s. It usage in America today illustrates the extent society has been subverted. Feminist activists are mostly Communist dupes.
The Communist goal is to destroy Western Civilization, which is dedicated to genuine diversity (pluralism), individual liberty and equal opportunity (but not equal outcomes). We have seen this destruction in the dismantling of the liberal arts curriculum and tradition of free speech and inquiry at our universities.
We have seen this virus spread to government, business, the media and the military. This could only happen because the financial elite in fact sponsors Communism. “Political correctness” has dulled and regimented our cultural life.
Recently here in Winnipeg, Betty Granger, a conservative school trustee referred to house price increases due to “the Asian invasion.” Granger was pilloried mercilessly in the press. People sent hate letters and dumped garbage on her lawn. At a School Board meeting, the Chairman acknowledged that she is not a racist. He acknowledged that Asians have married into her family. Nonetheless, Granger was censured because, and I quote, “appearances are more important than reality.”
This slippage from the mooring of objective truth is the hallmark of Communism. The atmosphere at the meeting was charged. Mild mannered Canadians, all champions of “tolerance” they behaved like wild dogs ready to tear apart an wounded rabbit.
Betty Granger repented and voted in favour of her own censure. These rituals of denunciation and contrition, typical of Stalinist Russia or Maoist China, are becoming commonplace in America. They are like showtrials designed to frighten everyone into conforming.
We have “diversity officers” and “human rights commissions” and “sensitivity training” to uphold feminist shibboleths. They talk about “discrimination” but they freely discriminate against white heterosexual men and feminine women.
They use the charge of “sexual harassment” to fetter male-female relations and purge their opponents. In 1980, three women in Leningrad produced 10 typewritten copies of a feminist magazine called Almanac. The KGB shut down the magazine and deported the women to West Germany. In the USSR, feminism has largely been for export.
According to Professor Weigand, her “book provides evidence to support the belief that at least some Communists regarded the subversion of the gender system [in America] as an integral part of the larger fight to overturn capitalism.”(6)
In conclusion, the feminist pursuit of “equal rights” is a mask for an invidious Communist agenda. The Communist MO has always been deception, infiltration and subversion.
The goal is the destruction of western civilization and creation of a new world order run by monopoly capital. Kate Weigand’s Red Feminism demonstrates that the Communist agenda is alive and well and living under an assumed name.
Meanwhile back in Russia…
The natural and traditional values of Russian Ladies were allowed to flourish.
Mother Russia quickly went back to being her proud, nurturing and beautiful self again.
And Goggling up “Russian Women” returns 8 million adoring sites.
October 10, 2008 at 7:04 am
“They talk about “discrimination” but they freely discriminate against white heterosexual men and feminine women.”
I could not agree more as I see it every day. I heard of someone that got fired around my neck of the woods for saying to his co-worker “What’s up girlfriend?”. If she didn’t like it maybe she should have asked him politely to not do it again instead of making a stink about it.
October 10, 2008 at 10:50 am
Hi Dale,
The story you mentioned is a perfect example of what’s happening. This is seriously a stealth socialist takeover happening in our country and society.
Many people mistakenly think that what’s happening in the US and the West is random.
It’s certainly not.
October 11, 2008 at 5:24 am
rw_man,
I think I’ve mentioned before that there was a time way back in my youth that I was very into supporting women’s right. It was in no small part because there were young ladies that I fancied jumping on that bandwagon and I was certain that getting on board would mean “getting more”.
It was when I read some “promotional information” at a rally in Madison, Wisconsin (around 1969 or 70) that I was taken aback by what the underlying message was to these girls. There were excerpts from various notable authors and feminist leaders of the day but they included Mary Inman’s view of a “utopian society” under some form of communist guideline, quotes from Marx’s Communist Manifesto, along with a lot of paragraphs from Frieden’s The Feminine Mystique. Of course there were taped speeches from Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda and masses of bra burning wanna’ be revolutionaries as well.
On the 30 minute drive back to my home town that night I made it completely clear to the couple of friends with me that there was no way in hell I would ever again take them to something like that or to support their “movement” as long as the goal was to destroy families while ‘villianizing and minimalizing’ all men within our society. (excuse the liberty taken with our language on those words)
I think a sad statement on the NA perception of this is that they only see a handful of angry women and some outspoken celebrities trying to make a point, and that it will all just go away eventually. It hasn’t gone away yet in over 40 years and that dupes many into thinking it no longer exists or that it no longer has any steam, when in fact this is the ugly and subversive nature of the beast. It has more power when people are not paying attention, and let’s face it, NA people are among the most apathetic on earth.
It is too bad that the views and information here aren’t being taught in our schools as one opposing view in our socio-political structure.
A side note to this from my history is an attempt to start something back in ’73 called W.H.A.M. (for the faint of heart, please don’t think of me as any sort of racist or anything) It stood for White Healthy American Males. At that time I had been actively seeking work for over a year and a half with nothing to show for my efforts. Jobs were being given to the expressed list of “affirmative action” applicants time and time again while I lived (for part of that time) in a very old and run down one car garage with a clay floor and no insulation. At one point I took a civil service test for a post office job and scored in the high 80s. To my understanding that made me almost a shoe in because hiring was going all the way down to 70%. I wasn’t hired and found later, thanks in part to the Freedom of Information Act that some people hired during that round had scores below 60% but because they were females, minorities or had some form of handicap they had been moved to the top of the hiring list. Equality seemed to me to have been completely done away with and replaced by a “fill the quotas even if they aren’t qualified” point of view. All of this, again, from the communist strategy book for disrupting and eventually deposing western civilization.
Keep placing the truth on these pages and working toward a better reality. It is one of the few vestiges openly expressing the call for social justice.
October 11, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Oh, dear. Children, children, children. You’re making me feel old. You see — I KNEW about the connection between Marxism and feminism, way back when the modern feminist movement began. I just didn’t think it would take root in American society so invasively.
About 20 years ago, I found, in a used book store, a book I remembered from my early teen years, “The Deliverance of Sister Cecilia,” by a nun who escaped Communist Czechoslovakia (as it was known then) around 1949. Back when I first read it, 1959 or so, it was a combination of a wonderful traditional Eastern-European upbringing rooted in faith, and a thrilling tale of escaping The Baddies by the skin of one’s teeth. Fast-forward thirty years, to when I found the book in the used-book store. I bought it and read it, and I tell you, my blood ran cold, to see how much of that book had come true in American society. In 1959, it was unthinkable in America. In 1989, it was established fact.
Food for thought.
October 11, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Feminism to western societies is what the Ebola Mayinga virus is to the human body. It is an incredibly lethal infection that rips it’s victims apart from the inside out then jumps to new victims in a chain reaction of death and destruction. Unlike viruses which rip a human being apart cell by cell, feminism rips societies apart one person at a time, en masse.
Taras
October 11, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Richard,
I give you credit for rejecting this form of Socialism so early on in the 70’s when much of that was out in the open and in vogue.
You gotta wonder where was the money coming from to fund all of these propaganda rallies. I’ve heard stories of the KGB throwing money there way to get the ball rolling but I’m sure many other sympathizers and leftist foundations were involved.
All traitors to humanity in my mind especially since this ideology is literally responsible for more deaths in human history then any other. .
October 11, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Hi Meg,
Thanks for joining us. I don’t have access to that book but would sure appreciate it if you have any interesting points to share from it with us.
I think the best story I ever read about Marxism was a science fiction short story called “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut.
Check out this summary of the story in Wikipedia.
“In the story, societal equality has been achieved by handicapping the most intelligent, athletic or beautiful members of society down to the level of the lowest common endowment. This process is central to the society, designed so that no one will feel inferior to anyone else.
This is overseen by the United States Handicapper General, Diana Moon Glampers.
Harrison Bergeron, the protagonist of the story, has exceptional intelligence, height, strength and beauty and thus has to bear enormous handicaps. These include headphones that play distracting noises, three hundred pounds of weight strapped to his body, forty pounds of birdshot around his neck, eyeglasses designed to give him headaches, and a mask to hide his beauty.
Despite these societal handicaps, he is able to invade a TV station and declare himself emperor. He strips himself of his handicaps, then dances with a ballerina whose handicaps he has also discarded. Both are shot dead by the brutal and relentless Handicapper General.
The story is framed by an additional perspective from Bergeron’s parents, who are watching the incident on TV, but because of their handicaps cannot concentrate enough to remember it.”
What’s interesting about this entry is that right underneath it you’ll also find the entry for “Political Correctness”.
Feminism and Marxism are truly scourges to the human race.
October 11, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Feminism was funded and pushed by the Rockafellers, Rothschilds, and Morgans to destabilize societies.
Men will only take so much before they will push back, and when they do push back, there will be a massive upheval in society, allowing them to create a new society.
Their goal is to form a One World Government with limitless control of people. They already control the money supply, and the value of the money in circulation.
There are only 4 countries left without a central bank controlled by these families. In 2001 there were 6. Would anyone care to guess which countries??
Afganistan and Iraq. Built on the blood, sweat, and tears of american and other soldiers, these families have gained control of the money supply of 2 more countries.
Untill all the nations of the world are under their control, these families cannot afford to destroy the US economy. They need the US too much.
Watch for trouble when Iran, Lybia, North Korea, and Venezuela succumb to these families, and their world bank.
October 12, 2008 at 12:15 am
. . . . . as it is written.
October 12, 2008 at 12:31 am
R.W. – This posting hits home, as I am an American academic, a college teacher in one of the ‘hard’ sciences.
I see, on a daily basis, concerted and increasingly blatant efforts to undermine the standing and well-being of white straight males. We’re only a few weeks into the new academic year, and already my department chair has stated twice during department meetings that he would *really* like to have a woman fill the slot that will be open next year due to the retirement of a faculty member.
Any woman or minority who seeks a job in academia, particularly if she seeks employment in mathematics, physics, engineering, what have you, is treated like royalty by would-be employers, often leaving a white male visiting instructor like me on the outside looking in, with little if any legal or other recourse.
I determined a while back that I wanted to stay in academia if at all possible, in spite of its many drawbacks, because it affords one a degree of freedom with one’s time that a corporate job does not. I would also like to, at some point, cultivate my own ‘cottage industry’, but even that is increasingly difficult here in the States. So, I’m busy trying to enlarge my skill set (ceramics now, woodworking later) as well as considering getting a TESL certificate so that I can improve my chances of acquiring a job abroad, should living stateside prove entirely inhospitable at some point (and it’s rapidly approaching that stage!).
Oh, what feminism hath wrought….
October 12, 2008 at 8:06 am
While Feminism is a huge problem in America, I fear the more immediate problem is the government’s incessant growth and infringement upon our liberties, economic and civil. If in doubt, vote out the incumbant congressman in your district. Additionally, consider voting third party this election cycle, to send a message that the complete lack of differing opinions among the two major parties (really one party controlled by the same people mentioned above) is unacceptable.
As for feminism, I’m happy to report that while many young ladies in my generation have fallen for the lies, there are some genuinely feminine girls to be found in America even now. I meet ladies all the time, that, after explaining my viewpoints on Feminism clearly, resoundingly agree with me.
Then there are those who have been totally duped. I’m not very convincing to them since when they say “There is no non physical difference between men and women” I literally just explode in to fits of laughter.
October 12, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Doesn’t matter who you elect, nothing will change. The GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation registered in another country. It even says so in the US statute from what I”m told.
Let me ask you this. When was the last time that you got to elect the CEO of a corporation that you are working for?? Let me guess….NEVER!!
Same witht he
October 12, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Doesn’t matter who you elect, nothing will change. The GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation registered in another country. It even says so in the US statute from what I”m told.
Let me ask you this. When was the last time that you got to elect the CEO of a corporation that you are working for?? Let me guess….NEVER!!
Same with the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. What I believe we get to elect is the person that gets to represent the executive branch of the corporation to us. Either that, or the elections are fixed, and our votes don’t count.
I”ll try to find the statute that states that the united States Goovernment turned control over to the corporation called the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I have to find it, and I believe the corporation is either registered in Porta Rico or the City of London. I can’t remember which.
October 12, 2008 at 9:57 pm
To begin with;
“When you become entitled to exercise the right of voting for public officers, let it be impressed on your mind that God commands you to choose for rulers, ‘just men who will rule in the fear of God.’
“The preservation of [our] government depends on the faithful discharge of this Duty; if the citizens neglect their Duty and place unprincipled men in office, the government will soon be corrupted; laws will be made, not for the public good so much as for selfish or local purposes; corrupt or incompetent men will be appointed to execute the Laws; the public revenues will be squandered on unworthy men; and the rights of the citizen will be violated or disregarded.
“If [our] government fails to secure public prosperity and happiness, it must be because the citizens neglect the Divine Commands, and elect bad men to make and administer the Laws.”
Even though these words are attributed to Noah Webster from the book, History of the United States published in 1832, they are more relevant today than they were even then. But what amazing insight considering it was written over 175 years ago. Our nation has been subverted by the exact same unjust men as Webster warns of. All of the laws are being made by and for the interest of selfish, corrupt, and incompetent people. Public revenues are being squandered and most definitely the rights of our citizens are being violated and ignored.
Now consider this; as was mentioned in Cody’s post, “vote out the incumbent congressman in your district”. For 20 years I have made, sold and proudly adorn my vehicles with a sticker that says, Re-Elect NO ONE. The majority of voting Americans cry for term limits then rush off to re-elect dangerous socialists like Ted Kennedy, a person who has never had (nor could he ever have) any job outside of government. Government service was never intended to be a career in and of itself. Men (I said men) were asked to give up their careers for a term of office to speak the voice of the people in their district. When is the last time that anyone in government has spoken for you as a voice that lives and works among you and your peers? I don’t recall it ever happening in my 55 years. Then at some point we allowed lawyers to become politicians and from the very first time there was a disproportionate number of lawyers in congress, our days as a free nation were numbered. Lawyers do not and never will speak for you and me. It simply can not happen. If you ever have a problem with a lawyer, who are you supposed to contact? Your local Bar Association. Who makes up the Bar Association? Retired lawyers. Hmmm. I wonder who they might side with. It is no coincidence that the words lawyer and liar sound so much alike. Now in all fairness, I have known two very honest men who practiced law. TWO. I have hired more than two different lawyers in any number of various years of my life, in various locations and I have found two who were honest. In my opinion lawyers should not be allowed in government.
While I disagree with Cody on the idea of trying to elect any third party or independent candidates at this point, I am convinced that the ballot box could be shaken by three consecutive elections where no incumbents win. The whole third party notion is still just a placebo panacea for the masses to let them think the system is open and fair. There is no real opportunity for any but “the two” to take and hold seats in either house yet, but after ousting and refusing to reinstate any of the lifers, it may not be long before anyone could run as independents and win.
Further more, Presidents and Prime Ministers do not write, rarely submit and never decide the laws of the land. It is really just that simple. The blaming of administrations by blaming the president would be as intelligent as blaming the guy pumping my gas for the exorbitant executive salaries at Exxon/Mobile. It is another part of the planned destruction of western society. The same social dissidence which sparked the feminist movement dictates that we create and support admonishment of our leadership.
In Washington State a few terms back, they elected a no experience, politically inept housewife to the US Senate. Her first year in office she was appointed to The Senate Appropriations Committee. No political background and in her freshman year she is seated at the most powerful financial decision making table in the free world . . . . . Nothing anyone can tell me will adequately explain how that could happen without the hands of corruption.
We sit on the brink of self destruction and/or revolution. Test the system with your vote but also we must vehemently encourage our friends and family to do the same. It doesn’t matter if your own brother is in office; Re-Elect NO ONE. It is no longer about picking the best person for the job or about following the party which claims to share most of your values. It is entirely about reshuffling the deck and forcing the reality on these jackasses that no one said it was a permanent position.
And if the electoral college places in office any president who fails the popular vote by more than a very few percentage points, demand recall of the delegates who failed to carry out your vote and settle for nothing less than the full and immediate power of the impeachment process.
This fight is far from over. It is, in fact, just beginning.
October 13, 2008 at 10:13 am
This is an interesting piece, one that far toooo relevant given the crossroads we as a society are at…I am paraphrasing my first post on this blog, given i have the same to say to this article and for those who didnt read it becoz it was an older piece.
I am an anti-Weminist, 21 yr old Indian , Export ManagementStudent from Mumbai, part time Family and Mens Rights activist, a qualified Healer who provides meditation workshops for women and children that have been rescued from trafficking.
Sorry to Admit, the lie that is Weminism almost had me for a while, given i live in a Patriarchial society – but my Submisive, Subservient , Shallow as a Puddle ( as per Brennsgrrl ) Genetics kicked up a fight and poor, weak, helpless me lost my the Weminist – Nirvana. Now all the power and fulfillment i can hope for even as Weminists befoul my Culture like they did yours in the 50 ’s and 60 ’s is finish my education , while still living my parents, till they find a fine boy for me — as is our Arranged marriage – No Need to Screw and Chuck a 100 Jerks – Routine, forced upon me by our Patriarchial Society.
Pitible , I agree when compared to the blazing path of Career Karma that is shamelessly rubbed into my face at my University and in our increasingly Liberal Media….What can we do… Poor Submissive me….
NOW THIS… we actually have openly Marxist ladies at the helm of the National Commission for Women, a govt body. They are at this moment trying to get an ordinance through so that a ” “Mistress” gets to sue for maintenance irrespective of whether a man is married or has kids with the said er…LADY
What a piece of Compost ???
This is how they are geting us as a culture to accept Marxist ideas…by getting the Govt to give 3 yrs of child leave to every female employee..by manipulating rape and dowry statistics so to entice hatred for men through propoganda in newspapers and news channels….
Slowly but surely they are spreading Socialist ideas through schools and colleges, without gullible boys and girls even knowing what they are swallowing…kind of what they did in the US.
Until recently i was living in ignorance of the implications of the Weminist doctrine even as i saw it gain pace in our culture. Exposure to blogs such as these helped awaken me from my stupor enough to spread the message to every Girl and Lady i know – Be Vigilant Ladies – The Lovelies that have destroyed 40 generations of the fine Christian culture in mere 4 decades have us marked… Guns everyone. NOW. If only to protect the finest of our Patriarchy. The men who are willing to lay their lives for our honor. Who build their lives around their wives and children, who shy from no sacrifice that needs to be made in the interests of their wives or kids. Who are only as much interested in their careers as is needed to better the lives of those that love them and not for their Strong egos that bear no scars of war with their Lovelies.Who are Self-Effacing in the interest of their wives and offspring to an extent approaching the Father above ……Oh how i love belonging to the Fatherhood of my Great Indian Men ….as opposed to the Sisterhood of Hypocrites who spare no excuse or opportunity to insult or mock women from other races for their OWN Choices that betray the Commandments of self-service.
If anything , it is the sheer hypocrisy of American Feminists that can open the eyes of One and All , even those who bought it hook, line and sinker, be it today or 50 yrs ago…
One can sacrcely believe the adjectives these ” Intellectual Empowered women use to describe women who are treated like Queens by their Husbands – as a reward for treating them like MEN —
Submissive, shallow, Brainwashed Patriarchial Puppet yadayadablahblah….
Meaning , just as say, Lenin or the like would justify his propoganda telling people they were being brainwashed into accepting less ,and if those who dont are happy..then well… they are ROBOTS.
A woman on another one of such blogs said American men marrying foreign women is a Slap of the face of Feminism that is ruining 50 yrs of Hard Work…and went onwith a bunch of other AW to pool all eastern women as nothing but victims who are co-culprits in the Patriarchialplot with such Losers who marry them….
Transparent to a novice , it is nothing but a poor defence mechanism employed by Egos conceived and raised on diet of Self-Victimisation and Denial of ones own true needs ….
On the whims of a few Upper-Middle class women with serious Daddy issues , Homosexul leanings and background of abuse
No kidding… from Simone ( who wanted to be a man depsertely so as to have a woman ) to Andrea ( who was raped at ten and then physically abused by her husband ) to Gloria ( who always missed her Daddy ) — Closet cases all of them, hell if they didnt hide it why would straight women buy their message and try to get their power from Men…not realising that to emasculate Men is a Lesbians Freudian Dreamscape….
and THAT is supposed to be an Intelligent Choice that Western Women exercised to the betterment of their Culture… ???
http://www.fisheaters.com/gb1.html
Cultural Marxism needs to be screamed about from Rooftops, destruction of the 4 stones of human identity..Family,Nation,Community and Religion..Blatant and easy to Prove.
Now …these maniacs are not ruining my family or any lady i know with their drivel. Every time i see Weminist behaviour i point it out and tell them about how it can lead to Cultural Aids…as will I spread the message through my work with the Mens rights group i am with and help them raise their daughters so they dont turn bad…Tough Job…but someones gotta do it eh ?
Looking at the feminist advocates filling up our Govt bodies ,who are no doubt well funded from Marxist pockets, i cant help but wonder WHY they dont come up with Hows and Whys of their proposed Social order being better, have they a single case study or empirical proof that can prove it is in a womans interests to quit being submissive ans family oriented ?
only from our point of view ,being Submissive and Subservient means not ONE SINGLE WOMAN lives off SocialSecurity and Raises her Kids with criminal tendencies in a Public housing ghetto.HOW can what these Harpies propose possibly be BETTER, if it entails Fatherless Kids and Rootless women ?
Being Subservient means I and others my type in Asia {{ oooohhhh…..i can smell the stench of an AW’s disgust at us sub-humans, have read and seen enough of what Liberted women think of us to serve their won self – denial…. }}
Well…it means a women is not permitted by society to let her Power override her individual responsibilities and roles in a Culture , we are not given scope to abuse our powers and treat our husbands like a wallet cum disposable tissue to be creamed in divorce court..Our divorce rate at 1 % annually is exactly what being Submissive is all about…
Patriarchial Control at its BEST ???
You Bet .
Ever heard Nothing Venture ..nothing Gain ???
How can a woman long to be a part of a healthy society without giving her own contribution and sacrifices to it ?
How can a woman think that her personal decisions to treat men like Competitors wont have Butterfly Effect that will destroy 40 generations of Christian culture. ?
How can a woman believe she is raising psychologically healthy children for the future culture – in the Daycare while she is off getting the Career she is “ Entitled “ to ?
When she rips them from their Fathers and makes Psyciatry the most lucrative profession ( incidentally the least lucrative in our country ) and Prozac the candy of choice for herself and generations after ?
And don’t say it’s a generalization for crying out loud, even Oprah says that ours is a nation living in Prozac..or in some cases rabid overeating,drugs,sexual imbecility yadayada.. ______ fill with appropriate self destructive, Lack of Parental Care repercussions….
If anything the above makes it claer what a Poison Liberalisation is.. to an individual who is given free reign and no higher authority exists to keep tabs on their ” Power ”
Each one of us Men and Women is a Microcosm of the Macrocosm, our individual choices make our history, culture and social dynamics..
As in the case of America .
The women who bought all the propaganda probably never dreamt this is where their whole culture would end given their supposedly correct INDIVIDUAL LONE choices, did they ?
Gloria certainly didn’t, as she admits herself, hell SHE even thinks they have gone too far …they never did anticipate women would consider Raping their Husbands of their Money and Self-Respect and their kids of their Innocence and Happiness – EMPOWERMENT…or did they ???
As for generalizing ALL into one lump…if anything what Weminists DID was generalize all MEN into Rapists and Oppressors who would if they could…The entire success of the Weminist doctrine was based on inciting Hatred and fear against Men and ALL women, from the looks of the repercussions DID INDEED BUY THAT ” ALL ” MEN WERE OUT TO OPPRESS THEM. Without any need of proof.
Makes one wonder , at the very idea that an entire generation of Women bought an Ideology Cultural Equality or Marxism ,the basis of which was never proved in any terms whatsoever ..And women think they are as intelligent as MEN ???????
I would shed tears for the plight of American women if it wasn’t so Darn Hysterical. And if they didn’t insist on treating me and other discerning Ladies as Submisive.
October 14, 2008 at 2:22 pm
I saw this and thought of you.
http://feelinfeminine.com/?page_id=2
And
http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/
They are very Christian-orientated, which also means modest clothing and no makeup, but I guess you can’t have everything!
The first link has links to lots of blogs of girls too such as http://femininityinafeministworld.blogspot.com/
Might bring a smile to your face?
January 26, 2009 at 3:26 am
I am just going to point out two facts:
First of all, when the Communist Manifesto was written, it was a radical response to horrible conditions. The working class–women and children included–worked 12 hours a day, 6 or 7 days a week. If they were injured because of unsafe machinery, they were fired because they could not work. I’m sure you already know this, but I’d like to make this point: at one time, communism was seen necessary by people who couldn’t foresee that capitalism would guarantee good working conditions. Communists, in general, were just fed up with the system, and, instead of reforming it, decided to find another way of living.
Communism is not inherently bad, it is just a system easy to take advantage of by dictators.
The second point is that both class wars and genders wars have been around long before communism. For thousands of years serfs have been ruled by lords, who have used them as labor to serve their own greed.
And women have been oppressed because nature made us physically weaker than men, not to mention the fact that we’re the ones who have to get pregnant and take care of children. I’ll concede that for a decade or so, feminism hasn’t been necessary in the United States, but it has been an issue, and don’t make light of it. It’s half the population, remember?
If a politician you dislike addresses an issue important to you and twists it for his own advantage, does that null the issue?
Simply because the gender issue was addressed first by Communists doesn’t mean it is less of an important issue–and that the Communists didn’t at least get SOMETHING right.
January 26, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Amanda,
This is a wonderful post you have placed. I agree with a lot of your key points.
I think most well read people understand the difference between Marxist Communism and the shortfalls of the Communism we have seen in practice around the world over the last 50 to 100 years. Certainly when Marx first published it in 1848, The Communist Manifesto was as vital and necessary as labor unions were to the free world many years later. Unfortunately we have seen both take on lives of their own and eventually run out of control. Working conditions had always been deplorable before people like Marx stepped up and said the things that needed to be said, whether met with criticism or praise. And I agree with you that there were many times throughout history when women and children were worked literally to death for reasons such as they were small enough, light weight enough or simply considered more expendable. But in the context of what we see on these threads, I believe it would be safe to say most views of Communism and the feminist movement talked about here are the clear result of recent and current real world effects and trends which have come out of once wonderful concepts.
As I have said before, there was a time when I drove some female friends to a feminist rally because I believed in them and also what they were telling me the movement was all about. It was only after seeing the anti family, anti American agenda presented in such a militant way that I said, “No more” and I have been opposed to the underlying message of feminism ever since. The big difference for me now is I show a great deal more respect for the subversive nature of that ideology and consequently keep a very close eye on where it is going as to better know how to avoid the poison it spews. I have a young daughter to protect from such dangerous ways of thinking.
I don’t think that anyone here is making light of feminism, in fact I think it is just the opposite. Most of us here, from what I can tell, have a somewhat equal view of it as exactly what it has turned out to be; that being destructive to marriage and families. At least of the men I know, there are few who consider feminism as something to be passed off or completely ignored. Solid men, men of character walk a fine line of fear and respect for anything that might tear down their family.
Further I would suggest that women of the past hundred years are no more victims than their male counterparts. It is often easier to just throw up your hands and say “I’m oppressed” than it is to seek common ground and work together. Pardon the vernacular of the farm but we used to say, “Ya’ can haul a lot more manure with a team than ya’ can with one horse”. A single horse can pull nearly a ton of weight but two horses working in a yoke can pull several tons. Again, I apologize if you don’t care for the analogy but when a man and a woman work together as a team, they can do several times more than when each of them is hanging on to their own selfish wants, needs and desires. And there is a part of history that few feminists will ever admit existed. Throughout time, couples who were committed to each other and their families have been life partners and neither felt misused or oppressed. It was Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda and the rest of their crowd that TOLD women they were oppressed even when the average North American woman did not feel cheated or second class within their marriages and homes. It was the constant badgering by the feminist machine that took smart, well adjusted women and made them question the sanctity of the family unit.
Looking ahead to where we are now women have recently passed men for heart disease, heart attacks and strokes. My, what a wonderful payment for buying into the feminist agenda. The competitive nature of what was once a male driven world carries a huge price. By dividing up that competitive battlefield between the genders, women are now dying faster and children no longer know what it is like to come home after school and see mom there with a warm bowl of soup or a cold glass of milk and some home baked cookies.
The tragedy I see in young people today is their despair over a total lack of any place in society. They are confused and frustrated beyond anything my generation dealt with. When I was a teen at least I some sense of where I could go in life and what sort of rewards came with the decisions I made regarding career and my personal life. Now the kids are staring out the window like a bunch of under aged retirees wondering if there will be any career they can move into and find some opportunity for success.
Change for change sake is never a good thing. Throughout time we have grown and evolved into more intelligent, more functional and more rounded people but every step has not been forward. Mistakes are a part of the human condition and the real loss comes from mistakes that we continue to make. By failing to learn from our follies, we WILL repeat them. Feminism was the solution to a problem which did not exist. Of the actual problems that were around prior to the feminist movement, such as equal pay for equal performance, it is still around today in many career fields but what’s worse is that now we have the added embarrassment of quota hiring and reverse discrimination which has only exasperated the original issue without it ever being solved. That is NOT progress.
I agree that Communism, at least Marxist Communism, is not all bad. I also agree that there was some value in the necessary changes to our workplace which came out of a purist view of the women’s movement. Sadly we humans never like to put things back in balance. We, at least in North America, are never satisfied until the pendulum has swung entirely to the other side so that our own selfishness wins out.
February 5, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Um…yes. I do see this as a problem. I do. It is just, bigger than this.
There are many ways in which our culture may be flawed as well and would not wish that on anybody. I see in the bible many problems with bare skin and the sexual ideal of women being portrayed, even women speaking is a biblical crime. I am sure that was not at all what caused this. I am pointing this out due to ‘the modeling’ and sexual appearances in Russian culture. I have never been offended but just noticed how Russia is Christian country, here sex is forbidden and beauty as being whorish as a Christian rule. ‘Rule Of The Thumb’ You may want to Google that phrase to see what it means.
February 8, 2009 at 11:19 pm
In The USA. There are so many opinions and views. I have a link to give an example.
February 8, 2009 at 11:20 pm
I actually was brought up by my father to go to college and take a huge career. I instead wanted to actually adopt children. Sometimes there are reasons people may not want children from men and women that do have to do with Feminism, but more so genetics and mental health problems.
February 11, 2009 at 3:56 am
Well I can assure you that feminism is making a corpse of any nation that it touches. Between dead babies via abortion,and high divorce rates, which breeds more divorce, and higher abortion rates, along with crime such as murder, robbery and rape, it makes one wonder if those that propagate such a theory as feminism, communism, closet communism, or progressive liberalism, don’t have some sort of self destruction button?
February 11, 2009 at 3:56 am
It’s like they are trying to destroy the world on purpose through their bad fiscal policy, and self destructive theories that we know do not work, and lead to self destruction. Things like equality, and forced equal outcomes. They are only parroted by our elite to robin hood the rich, and increase the power of the central government. The only capitalists left will be the super rich, who made a pact to carry out the will of satan (that is a common thread among the Invisible hand, or the trillionarres)and who think they are gods as they set up the new world order, with their messiah as its leader. The Christian Anti Christ.
March 1, 2010 at 12:03 am
There is a war,a cultural war,hidden,but there is.
Their goals:Feminism,1968,nihilism,hedonism,promarxist feelings in west(Hitler NEVER had “understanding” in the west,CCCP and commie states were tried to “understand”)MTV,Hollywood scum,ACLU,European Union,gay “movement”,etc.
This is the cultural marxism,started by Gramsci and Lukacs,they never could think in the great succes in the heart of the western soul.
Solzhenitsyn said that there is no strenght in the west to confront marxism,because off the extremly economic sucess.
Welfare state is responsabile,by far.
It promoves all the cultural war.
In the 50’s,Derrida,Foucalt,Guatari,promoved Deconstuctivism,death of western culture,a way to get to the power withouth using the weapons.
I have to admitt that they have won,how on earth a bloody commie Fidel Castro was received like a Hollywood star in 1995 in NYC????????
Only imagine if Pinochet…..(3000 deths versus 70.000)
Feminism is powerful,you try to defend “the weak”,but you destroy the weak and yourself.
They brainwash you,”progresism”and you never realize of the truth.
In the name of the antifascism(I hate it),cultural marxism has won the battle,and most of the people never knew about this war.