Although I didn’t have accurate figures like what you see below I always knew that something was very wrong with the Female situation in California and especially in Silicon Valley.
Well now I have solid proof.
In any-case I’d be real interested in getting feedback on where some of you Gentlemen live according to this Map.
Would you consider moving to the East Coast, Chicago or Detroit as a decent option given the greater numbers of Women there?
Anyways let me know what you think.
Cheers, GL
Russian Women - The Real Truth 
April 12, 2007 at 2:45 am
With the current situation in the U.S., abosolutely not! I’ve been married once, which became a nightmare that led to me divorcing her. I’m not going to get married here when a woman can do whatever she pleases and I get villified, stuck with the bill, or both. Women here in general want all the advanatages but now of the obligations that go with being married, they think those are for men. Until that changes, the marriage rate will soon be zero here, and the only children being born here will be to people shacking up or to illegal aliens. Even when there are more women than men, if you’re a regular nice, normal, responsible guy, you’ll be ignored at best. At worst, you’ll encounter only the ones who already messed up their lives, have several kids already, and expect you to be their sugar daddy. You could then lose everything you’ve ever worked for at her whim with the fully power and blessing of the government behind her. How’s that for gratitude? NYC may have more single women than men, but you can bet that’s because finding one that worth marrying there is like finding a needle in a field full of haystacks. It’s not worth the effort. That is why American men are looking to Russia and other countries abroad, and why some are relocating there.
Taras
April 12, 2007 at 5:19 am
Forget it. Even if I move from Silicon Valley to Miami, I’ve still got to deal with AW.
Once you’ve had the taste of Russian girls, it’s impossible to go back to the old stuff…
April 12, 2007 at 8:03 am
That map looks like a junior high school dance — boys on one side, girls on the other.
I live in Phoenix, which according to that map has a lot more men than women. I can’t say I’ve really noticed that, but maybe it does help explain some things.
Anyway, I am planning to move to New England in the near future, but for other reasons besides women outnumbering men. I guess it’s encouraging to think that there are a large number of available women there, but as we know quality is more important than quantity. Where’s the map that shows where the quality women outnumber the party girls?
April 12, 2007 at 9:53 am
Living in the upper mid-west, Central Wiscinsin, I would tend to agree with Greenlander. It doesn’t matter.
Dishonesty and lack of family values, etc., etc, tends to make one think they can ALL be red and the nature of the women of America today will not change. I include the women of Canada in that as well.
Marriage of convenience does not make up for lack of quality character nor in an honest desire to share life with someone they respect and love for those same reasons.
😉
Canajun
April 12, 2007 at 1:02 pm
It is apparent that you are posting that map based on demographic of men and women and making the comment that it’s better to find women in areas where there are more single girls than men. It’s just all generalizations.
I don’t buy any theory that more women than men would result in bigger number of good women. The ratios are really irrevelant. You only need to find one who is crazy enough to marry you. Like one person said, “I can marry anyone I please. The problem is that I don’t please anyone.” On the other hands, I know I have better odds of finding a good woman outside of the USA, but all of it comes down to one woman who wants to marry you.
I grew up and lived all of my life near Washington, DC and have lived in several cities in the Northeast. Still I have hard time finding very pretty women with characters. I keep seeing so many overweight women who just let themselves go. Too many typical career women who care more about her career and status much more than family, being happily married, happy to be at home being with family and relaxing, and just go working for bringing more money to the family. I am still out of the AW’s market.
April 12, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Absolutely not.
The map is misleading, because if you look at the Bay Area in detail, and break it down by sexual preference, you will see that San Francisco is *crawling* with frustrated single women of all ages who cannot find a decent boyfriend. Seriously, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel.
In fact, the situation here is so good, it’s extremely easy to establish multiple long term relationships with as many women as you please. Just man up to it, laugh at any bullshit about “exclusivity,” demand they treat you with respect, and it’s practically a dating paradise.
The key thing is you gotta go for what you want and don’t bend an inch until the woman treats you well. The women here are smart, well-educated, ambitious and overall have extensive dating experience. Show ’em you got balls, you are ahead of 99% of all the other guys trying to kiss their *ss.
I love it here, and I have a super girlfriend now, who treats me well, and doesn’t give me any bullsh!t when I spoil her (I love to spoil women). She knows if she tries to tool me, I’ll find someone else to spoil in a heartbeat.
And the weather is superb.
April 12, 2007 at 4:42 pm
I’ve been to New York and it’s numerous bars and clubs in Manhattan. Lots of single women and I actually seen numerous times young women actually try to get men attention and even some actually pick up men by going to the men’s tables. So yes New York and even Boston(I’ve been to that famous Cheers pub in my short stay there) have more women than men overall.
I prefer foreign women like Russian women or other Former Soviet Union women since they are more feminine in their ways compare to most North American women out there.
April 12, 2007 at 11:45 pm
You know, it occurs to me that in a lot of those areas where women outnumber men, it could be because those areas have a lot of senior citizens (e.g., Miami). Since women tend to live longer than men, you’d end up with a lot of widowed elderly women in those areas, who would be included in the female demographic.
The map would be more useful if it only took into account single women between the ages of 18 and 30.
April 13, 2007 at 5:18 am
David Clare:
Again, I’ve gotta disagree with a lot of what you’re saying.
First of all, I haven’t been to San Fransisco, but if it’s anything like the other cities in the US I’ve been to, the situation is more about frustrated guys that can’t find a decent girlfriend than “frustrated single women of all ages who cannot find a decent boyfriend.”
If they can’t find a decent boyfriend, it’s not because none exist, but because more and more decent American men are getting tired of the games that American women play, and their shallow demeanors.
In fact, a big part of the reason why this site is up is to address that situation; to give quality American men an opportunity to find decent girlfriends and wives overseas in Eastern Europe and Russia so that they are not stuck with shallow, materialistic American women from US urban areas such as San Fransisco.
I definitely agree with you that it is a bad idea to kiss up to women, but you seem too willing to accept the premise that if you do not kiss up to them, they will either 1) see you as more desirable or 2) realize that the world does not revolve around them. Admittedly, this is a tantalizing premise in theory, but I’ve never seen this happen in practice.
Not kissing up to women and demanding respect from them will save you personally a lot of grief, that’s for certain, but if they are looking for someone who will kiss up to them, which many (probably most) American women are, then they will simply find someone else who will.
In other words, if a woman hasn’t realized that the world doesn’t revolve around her by the time she is old enough to date, its doubtful that the actions of one man can totally counteract this.
The only solution is to find a woman who realizes that there are more important things in life than being pandered to all the time and having the world revolve around her. The women who realize this are those who have traditional values who (again) mainly live in Eastern Europe and Russia, and can occasionally be found in the rural US (like the girlfriend I had when I was 18). Unfortunately, finding such a woman in San Fransisco would be like finding a needle in a haystack.
–Luke Skywalker
April 14, 2007 at 2:21 am
Alberta is the most demographically equal province in Canada. Last time I heard, there were only 180-200 more women then men there. The age ranges weren’t specified.
If you want a good woman there, you have to marry the mennonite or hutterite women. They are good, traditional women, but they don’t keep themselves as nicely as the Russian women seem to. They never use makeup, and wear clothes that aren’t very flattering. Let’s put it this way, they make little effort to look beautiful for their man. They think that being well scrubbed is good enough.
April 14, 2007 at 2:46 am
Guys,
As someone who’s lived in NJ almost all of his life, I’ll simply say this: 1) I never knew women outnumbered men here-not with the absurdly high standards (read demands) women have for men; 2) the women here SUCK! Yeah, you read that right; they S-U-C-K. You’d be hard pressed to find more selfish, stuck up, narcissistic bitches than are found in the NE USA.
I’ll take your word for it that women outnumber men here. But, as the old saying goes: the odds may be good, but the goods are ODD. IOW, the fact that women outnumber men doesn’t matter; you’re still stuck with shit women, only you have more of them-end of story.
MarkyMark
April 14, 2007 at 4:53 am
I second what MarkyMark says. I live outside of Boston, and I’ve already made a couple of posts about the (at best) suspicious attitude of most women I run across in daily life. Especially the young ones – growing up with girl power, segue-ing into wimmins studies courses. (And this is an overeducated part of the country in general.)
There’s also a strange MA/NH phenomenon (I’m not from here originally, so it really stands out for me): there are a lot of crude, aggressive, obnoxious women. They almost seem to be consciously striving to be as unfeminine as possible. Combined with the guttural, gravelly Massachusetts accent, it makes them singularly unappealing.
April 14, 2007 at 3:34 pm
Agreed, Craig, I dated a couple of middle-aged women from NH and they were everything you said, plus they had no self-awareness; just delusional beyond belief.
April 14, 2007 at 5:46 pm
I went to my local library to find and borrow that National Geographic magazine Feb 2007 issue. It has the cover photo and story about Healing the Heart. Anyways, it doesn’t matter where there’s more women than men or not, it’s the women’s attitude and their unfeminine traits that’s a turn off for me not to mention many of them are fat, don’t know how to put on make up or use make up, or dress well, etc.
Again, I only find foreign women from developing countries or where women are feminine attractive like Russia and FSU.
Actually below of the map on the same page in the National Geographic magazine Feb 2007 issue, there’s an article I will copy to here word for word as I have the magazine in front of me(can’t find the online version in National Geographic website).
Here it is:
Single and looking? Lonely singles’ chances of finding mates are influenced by which side of the Mississippi they live on, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Western urban areas tend to boast an excess of single males, while many eastern cities feature a preponderances of females. Demographers say a few key factors shape this trend; notably, 58 percent of college students are women, giving most of the East’s numerous college towns a female majority. After graduating, legions of these women join the white-collar workforce, which is 51 percent female and centered in big cities such as New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. Areas with more single men often have large numbers of illegal immigrants, some 58 percent of whom are male and generally work either in districts that rely on agriculture or in cities with booming construction sectors, such as Las Vegas. —Peter Gwin
April 14, 2007 at 6:17 pm
Luke,
You make some really good points, and up until two years ago, I would have agreed with you about SF.
In fact, two years ago I would hae agreed with you about most all of it.
But my experience in the last two years has changed me. Tremendously.
Both men and women are extremely frustrated…
The root of it is that women are now “liberated,” but men are not. Men are still laboring under a completely false impression of what a boyfriend or husband must be. True, those traditional roles are not bad at all, and women in other parts of the world appreciate it more, but it’s no longer necessary here in the US. Nor in UK from what I understand. Here’s the deal: there is now a wide spectrum of relationships between “single” and “married.”
The biggest misconception here is that US women are looking for man “to kiss up to them.” This is completely wrong. What they are looking for, desperately seeking, is a man who will *stand up to them.* Which turns out to be pretty simple: just do what you want, treat women with respect, and the nanosecond one tries to tool you, politely, and very firmly, escort her out the door.
Instead, most men will do one of the following:
1. Capitulate to her bullshit with resentment. She will leave sooner or later.
2. Emotionally abuse the woman (assholes tend to attract low-self-esteem women).
3. Run away.
There is a 4th alternative: laugh at her and indicate that she should be taking her pants off. This is heavily field-tested. It works.
And when you lay a woman on the first or second date (they almost all put out on the 3rd, if you get that far), you will nip most of the bullshit in the bud, before it even starts.
If you think a woman that can be seduced on the first or second date, or even the third date is a “slut” or a “whore,” our conversation ends here.
Women love sex. Be the man who allows them to enjoy it. Not the man who makes them feel “slutty” or “whorish.”
And if you say you believe sex isn’t that important in a relationship, then it’s tremendously easy with US women to establish loads of “Let’s Just Be Friends” relationships. Also field tested. Is that what you want?
Fundamentally, US women are ridiculously easy to get into bed, and to have good relationships with, but you *must* step up to the plate and deal.
Just to be perfectly clear… I completely totally, 100% agree with you on formal, traditional marriage relationships. The legal structure in the US punishes men severely for marrying, at the women’s whim. And US women are very well aware of their power indeed.
Take care, and keep writing!
April 14, 2007 at 11:57 pm
David Clare,
First of all, I’m not sure whether your statement “The biggest misconception here is that US women are looking for man ‘to kiss up to them.'” was made with me personally in mind, or was made with US men as a whole, or at least a certain percentage of them, in mind. I’ll make the logical assumption that the latter is the case, as this is a belief that seems to be held by many men.
Getting down to brass tacks, if we are willing to entertain the statement: “The biggest misconception here is that US women are looking for man ‘to kiss up to them'”, then it would seem necessary to ask the question: ‘Why has such a belief been formed, and why is it held on such a large scale?’
Part of the answer to this question can be found in one of the posts on this blog, entitled “A Prostitute’s Game and a Path to Hell”. In this post, GL discusses a California woman who used her attractiveness to manipulate men into buying her gifts, giving her money, etc. In other words, she manipulated men into kissing up to her. And when she was tired of one man, she would simply dump him and move onto the next.
This woman’s modus operandi of manipulating men into kissing up to her, and then dumping them once they can no longer pay out (or she is simply tired of them) is not confined to this individual case, but is prevalent in a large proportion (as far as I can tell, the majority proportion) of women in the US and the West. Also, the fact that several of GL’s readers related this story to their overall experiences with US / Western women speaks to the truth of this statement.
Thus, I’m not inclined to accept that “What they are looking for, desperately seeking, is a man who will *stand up to them.*” due to the fact that a man who will stand up to them [the majority of Western women] runs counter to their modus operandi.
If the belief that “US women are looking for man ‘to kiss up to them’” is indeed a misconception, it is only because the men who hold this belief have neglected the rural US (which I myself have had a fair amount of experience with). There are at least a few good ladies from the rural US whom I have had the pleasure of meeting who definitely exhibit a different sort of behavior altogether than what I see 99% of the time from American / Western women.
………………………
You’ve said: “Both men and women are extremely frustrated… The root of it is that women are now “liberated,” but men are not […]”
As for the men’s frustration:
Yes, many men have been frustrated by the results of “women’s liberation”. Many times, their frustration results from incidents like in the story I described above. However, men are beginning to respond to their frustration in a very effective manner through pursuing relationships with women from more traditional cultures, such as those in Eastern Europe and Russia. Successful relationships and marriages with women from more traditional cultures have completely spelled the end of the “frustration” for quite a significant number of men. And at that point, those men do in fact become liberated, because they are able to have loving, meaningful relationships, and no longer have to put up with the games played by the majority of American / Western women.
As for the women’s frustration:
It is clear that the woman in GL’s story ended up being very frustrated in the end. It is also clear that other women who follow her path will also end up being frustrated. But it is equally clear that frustration is something that these women bring upon themselves by acting in this way. In other words, their frustration is not the fault of men, but of themselves.
–Luke Skywalker
April 15, 2007 at 3:04 am
I was looking through some corespondence in my e-mail account. I had some e-mail for some Russian girls. One very interesting phrase they used when refering to their future husband was “second half”.
And I got to thinking, it’s an interesting concept that is expressed in those two words in that context. They aren’t after just a husband, they want someone that will complete them, compliment them, and be strong where they are weak, and they want to be that same for their man.
The woman here want a partner, an equal. He might just as well be one of the girls, and she one of the guys. They might as well be a business partner with (very few) benefits. They don’t want to work to make the relationship better, all they want is to know what they can get from the deal, d only want to make the smallest concessions possible to get what they want.
Just curious if any of you have seen what I just realized??
April 15, 2007 at 3:41 am
wolverine, I see that in most women’s personal ads here – “I don’t need a man”, “I don’t want to be dependent on a man”, “I’m looking for a man to complement me, not complete me”, etc. (So now I’m a fashion accessory?)
Contrast that with a woman who says “I’d be happier if I had my one and only. I want to love and be loved, I want to take care of my dearest person.”
I’ll take door #2.
April 15, 2007 at 4:43 am
I agree with you Craig.
April 15, 2007 at 5:44 am
David Clare,
i think you are misstaking what most of us are looking for. It is not an easy lay but a life partner. If you are looking for only that, please stay away from “MY” potential life partner and Russia…
THank you
April 15, 2007 at 10:50 am
Yes, I agree. The whole map could be orange and it would not matter – the men of this board are after quality, which is not to be found in america.
April 16, 2007 at 4:58 am
Luke,
You have raised some *extremely* relevant issues, and I really like your approach. Responding will take more time than I have at the moment, and I want to devote some time to giving you a response worthy of the developing conversation.
Succinctly: I hear what you’re saying, but I will tell you that if you tried to “buy” my girlfriend, she would kick your ass.
Craig!
These two things are not mutually exclusive!
In fact, this personal ad you read strikes at the very heart of everything facing modern men today, me, you, everyone reading this blog, my blog, whatever. It’s not about being a fashion accessory. It’s about being a true partner to her, in a relationship with one man she can meaningfully contribute to. Ask that woman what she really wants, and I guarantee she is looking for that one special guy. Guaranteed.
April 16, 2007 at 11:50 pm
You’re right, David, wanting a partner who complements you isn’t a bad thing in and of itself. it’s just that when I hear this from American women, alarm bells go off in my head.
For one thing, it sounds like they’re just parroting something they read in Cosmo. And it doesn’t strike me as a positive vision of a relationship for them, but rather a preemptive defensiveness, with a lot of ideological baggage behind it.
April 17, 2007 at 12:42 am
Craig,
I subscribe to Cosmo!
Strategy and tactics at any level: know your opponent. Heh.
If you know how to read it, Cosmo is a *gold mine* of information. The most important this to understand is that Cosmo is as much as mirror of popular culture as an arbiter.
Even women saying they hate Cosmo and never read it, still agree with the fundamental premise: men suck at relationships and its up to the woman to acquire as much power in the relationship as early as possible and guide the relationship from that position of power.
Problem is, that doesn’t really turn to many women on.
And notice that the average guy they write about in Cosmo is what most of would call a “natural,” the “hot guy who gets girls easy.” The rest of us not making the cut.
This is not a problem. As a man, lead the relationship, Cosmo chick type problems go away.
I completely understand about the alarm bells. They go off in my head as well when I hear stuff like that. You have a very a good point about preemptive defensiveness and ideological baggage. But these women are trapped too. On the one hand they are told to be all they can be, to be free, to live life to the fullest, that they can have everything they want… then society turns right around and calls them sluts and whores for indulging in a little recreational sexuality.
Really key is being able to just accept women for what they are. Some of them are whorish, some of them are freaky, some of them are straight out good girls. Love them all, and don’t let *any* of them near your wallet!
April 18, 2007 at 2:27 am
Gentlemen (and ladies):
I read a lot of blogs, including MRA-type blogs.
One thing I really like about this blog is that Luke, and most of the men commenting here, genuinely love and adore women as a whole. This is in serious contrast to many of the other blogs where anger and bitterness rule.
I still intend to comment on this thread extensively… I’ll probably put detailed comments on my blog, then drop a comment in here when it’s done.
Also, Luke, I would like to link to your blog, if you don’t mind being listed next to some local pickup instructors and world-class playboys!
~dc~
April 18, 2007 at 3:42 am
David Clare:
I’m sorry I haven’t had more time to respond to what you’ve been saying.
It’s getting to be that time of year in which I have a huge amount of papers, assignments, and exams.
You say a lot of things, some of which I agree with, and some of which I disagree with.
Now I acknowledge that my responses to you may have tilted more towards the “disagree” column, but understand that that’s nothing against you personally. It’s just that seeing stuff that I disagree with motivates me a lot more to write than when I see stuff that I agree with. So when I write, its more often than not about the stuff that I disagree with. (And that’s the way I am in my philosophy classes, too.)
And with that I’ve got to get back to work.
–Luke Skywalker
April 19, 2007 at 12:00 am
With that being said, I must say that I strongly disagree with a proposition that you have recently posited:
“Even women saying they hate Cosmo and never read it, still agree with the fundamental premise: men suck at relationships and its up to the woman to acquire as much power in the relationship as early as possible and guide the relationship from that position of power.”
I’m not sure whether you meant that this is Cosmo’s fundamental premise, or merely a fundamental premise that most women in our society take to be true, even those who don’t read Cosmo. I personally have never read Cosmo, so I wouldn’t know.
In either case, I object to both the premise itself, and to the way in which the premise came to be held as a belief by these women.
I will deal first with my objection to the latter. During these last forty years, the feminist movement has gained a vast amount of control over our culture. Propaganda from radical feminists and their organizations has caused a vast ripple effect, greatly impacting Western media and society. The doctrines of feminism have penetrated deeply into Western culture; so deeply that they can and do have a profound impact upon the formation of many Western women’s everyday attitudes toward men.
Consider a typical argumentation of a radical feminist.*
Compare this with:
Consider the similarities between these two sets of statements:
-similar logical structure
-both espouse the broad proposition that women are superior to men in a very broad area, but lack proper justification for this.
-both propose that women must take power from men due to the belief that men are too inherently flawed to handle that power.
-neither A nor B existed as prevalent sets of beliefs before second wave feminism, and both have undergone an increase in prevalence since the arrival of second wave feminism.
April 19, 2007 at 12:01 am
Aside from cosmetic differences, the only real difference between A and B is that the word “society” is replaced with the word “relationship”. But if one takes into consideration that relationships can become marraiges, which can become families, and that families are the building blocks of any society, these two groups of statements might not be that different at all.
These similarities do show a link between feminist doctrines and the “men suck at relationships” premise. (Further analysis on how strong a link this is, I will leave for another day.)
Still though, if it can be shown that B is a correct and valid argument leading to a true conclusion, then any similarities between A and B can be dismissed as simple coherence, which is not meaningful in and of itself. However, we shall soon see that this is not the case. (But because I am busy, this too will have to wait until next time. To be continued.)
— Luke Skywalker
*Endnote: (For the sake of simplicity, what I give here is a generic example rather than exact quotes from a particular radical feminist, but I am by no means setting up a straw man: similar quotes and argumentation can easily be found in the works of many outspoken radical feminists such as Andrea Dworkin.
In fact, even though I meant this as a generic example, I now see that it actually mirrors quite closely an argument that Dworkin has given in one of her works. Seeing this, I may list out Dworkin’s argument for analysis at some later date.)
**Another Endnote: I broke this post up into two separate comments in order to avoid the spam filter. This comment and the one before it are parts of the same post.
April 19, 2007 at 12:07 am
Note: There was a second half to that post that I just wrote (ending with “…since the arrival of second wave feminism.”)
I split my post up into two comments in an attempt to avoid the spam filter, but it seems like the filter got me anyway.
April 19, 2007 at 4:27 pm
D.C., I would like to say this. If you can’t trust a woman with money, the trust isn’t there to have a good relationship. A good relationship comes from being able to fully trust each other.
Just my 2 bits.
April 21, 2007 at 10:43 pm
Amen to that Woverine. I couldn’t agree with you more.
Taras
May 6, 2007 at 1:51 am
I live in Denver, Colorado. I have to say its a terrible place to live if you want to find a good woman.
May 6, 2007 at 3:04 pm
In my life, I’ve lived in NY, IN, NH, FL, and IL, and I have to say they were ALL terrible places to find a good woman. I won’t even look in the U.S. anymore.
May 13, 2007 at 9:46 pm
Hey GL, my friend Anne has told me about her wedding. Perhaps you should add the fun and games of Russian weddings to your list of reasons to have left the US. Maybe a post on wedding traditions there would be good.
I’m sure that ‘randsoming the bride’s shoe’ will stir up a lot of interest. To bad weddings here aren’t that fun. 😦
May 15, 2007 at 9:58 pm
my friends,, i did this is experimente and it sucks!!!
i posted and ad with a girls pic in craigslist,, and you know how many males ( and not all loosers) answered?? in one hour 25…i have to go to ukraine or russia,, too much competition here…
May 18, 2007 at 3:05 am
Gents
Let me advise you that the situation is very much the same in Australia. The women you speak of in the USA that you have turned your backs on exist here in Australia as well — just the accent is different.
Thankfully we have the FSU
May 18, 2007 at 4:00 pm
For most men, weddings in the U.S. are about as fun as going to a funeral.
Taras
June 27, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Very interesting gender distribution…
Women in the NE, men in the SW.
But I think I figured out the reason – Mexican immigration.
Most of the Mexican immigrants (illegal or not) are MALE – and most settle along the border states. Were it not for them, there’d probably be a slight female surplus everywhere.
July 18, 2007 at 2:47 am
Funny … same problem in Brazil … brazilian women are the worst in the galaxy! and having in mind what u guys said here, now I know that I must not look for a woman in North America either … all the same shit.
But interesting how russian women gave me a much better impression too … they make me very curious about them , a curiosity that I don’t feel for any brazilian women anymore…
July 18, 2007 at 6:13 am
Hi Soulful,
I actually know two guys from the US who decided to live in South America for the same reason. But the interesting thing is.. now they want to move to Russia or the FSU to find greener pastures for themselves. So who knows.. maybe we have the start of a trend here. 🙂
Thanks for joining us and please tell your friends.
GL
October 24, 2007 at 1:24 am
The women here in SoCal are as a rule (with few exceptions) some of the most narcisstic, entitled, stuck-up b***hes a man could know. Divorce here is as common as the common cold. It’s so bad that many men have just turned into PUAs and don’t ever plan to marry.
The exception to this seems to be in some (not all just some) of the better churchy families where modeling, healthy expectations, nuclear family, etc… still hold true.
Just one observation.
November 26, 2009 at 4:08 am
This explains why I had such a good time in Miami…